Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Book Reviews


With the remaining holidays but a meagre few weeks more, I came to realize that I have not written any decent English articles as a means to maintain or even to improve my grasp of said language. In order to prevent myself from slowly sliding into the abyss of procrastination, I have decided to write reviews of books, novels or short stories as often as possible.

Tales of Heresy is one book I acquired recently and one that I had looked foward to reading. It contains stories by established canon Warhammer 40K series writers such as Dan Abnett, Graham McNeill, James Swallow and others. Unlike other books in the series, Tales of Heresy does not bear the Warhammer 40K logo on the front cover. I have to admit, the art cover is very well done indeed.

For those unfamiliar with the Warhammer 40K universe, Tales of Heresy is part of the canon series chronicling the infamous Horus Heresy which was the singular event in which one of the Emperor's son -Horus - betrayed, waged war upon and in the ensuing final battle crippled him, which lead to the ongoing struggle between mankind and chaos.

The stories included in the book are as follows:
Blood Games by Dan Abnett
Wolf at the Door by Mike Lee
Scions of the Storm by Anthony Reynolds
The Voice by James Swallow
Call of the Lion by Gav Thorpe
The Last Church by Graham McNeill
After Desh'ea by Matt Farrer

I have yet to read any of the stories, but will do so and review them soon.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Revert to Mother Tongue Instead

There are plenty of arguments in favour of using English or Bahasa Malaysia or both as a medium of instruction for Mathematics and Science. But why not use the students’ own mother tongues?

Instead of just English and Bahasa Malaysia, there should be a wider choice for students. Let Chinese students study Science and Mathematics in Mandarin; let Indian students study Science and Mathematics in Tamil; and so on.  If students are forced to study in a language they do not fare well in, they would feel frustrated and eventually hate both the language and the subject and just give up. This does not only apply to Science and Math. When I was studying in secondary school, I was terrible in BM, and as a result scored poorly in Pendidikan Moral, Sejarah and the likes. However, I aced all the subjects that were taught in English and Mandarin. On the other hand, my friends who enjoyed BM but disliked English and Mandarin fared differently- they aced subjects in BM and did poorly in the rest.

Now, with reference towards Ronin Tay’s letter “Look at the world and revert to Bahasa”, I would like to say that we cannot just compare our country’s education system with those of other more developed countries. We as a whole are not mature enough. How long has the proper education system in Malaysia been established? 60-70 years perhaps? Compared to countries such as France or Japan, our standard is still not up to par. We do not have full scientific recognition in the international level.

Sure, we can use Bahasa Malaysia as a medium in teaching Maths and Science, but only if the student chooses so. This should also be true with the other languages of the major ethnic groups in Malaysia. Why deny the Chinese the right to study Maths and Science in Mandarin? After all, China has some of the best mathematicians and scientists in the world. The famous Pythagoreas’ Theorem came centuries after it was first thought of in China. The Olympiad Mathematics in China is also arguably the toughest in the whole world. Mandarin is also the most used language world-wide. Also, why deny the Indians from learning Maths and Science in Tamil? Mandarin, English and Tamil rank higher than BM in terms of number of speakers and users internationally. Therefore, there has to be the freedom of choice for students.

Rather than just debate endlessly on the pros and cons of teaching Maths and Science in the respective languages, why not focus on improving the national education system itself? As mentioned by Ronin Tay, examinations just test the students’ memory, and I agree. I skipped Form 5 and the SPM examinations to enroll in a pre-university course in an international school. Although I did decently in my previous school, I had trouble adjusting to the new system. Everything was taught in English, except for second languages which were optional. The teachers encouraged independent, dynamic and creative learning; text books are secondary and no one is expected to memorize facts and just regurgitate them in class. For projects, guidelines were given and we had to work hard on our own or as a team. Students are also encouraged to take part in constructive discussions and debates. Although it seemed hard at first, I gradually got used to this system, and found that I enjoyed it. Back in my old school, there was little room for creativity. The syllabus does not allow students to question it.

It is unfair to just criticize the current implementation of languages used to teach subjects in school. It is merely the product of an unstable education system. We need a revision of the system, or future generations of students will suffer even more.

Labels: ,